Called $COPPER bullish on Apr 18, 2025: $COPPER rose 20% in 3 months.
View call →
Commodities | Stocks | FX | Macro Value + Momentum. Finding asymmetric setups at cycle lows. My investment letter ↓ Not advice.
Cite asCryptoQuant has tracked the directional calls on BZ by @ValueSeeker_ on X since Mar 2025: not yet scored on BZ (as of Nov 11, 2026).
Other assets covered (12)
6 BZ calls on record, a thin history.
Relative view by default: fewer than 30 BZ calls or days on record.
Sentiment timeline shows relative sentiment within this analyst's history. A perma-bull showing 8 bullish : 2 bearish in a bear market sets that as their baseline. If you notice any errors, claim @ValueSeeker_ to submit corrections.
Called $COPPER bullish on Apr 18, 2025: $COPPER rose 20% in 3 months.
View call →Hover the chart to read the thesis of that period · click a day to pin it
OUTPERFORMING BY SELLING MY HIGHEST CONVICTION I explained in the article below why did I sell my highest conviction because my portfolio management process required it. "While having used a 50%/50% long position on URNM and XLE from August 2020 would have generated a return of 306.5%, having rebalanced as indicated above would have generated an excess return of +55.9% over the period, or +7.6% p.a." Link in comment below ↓
View original →COPPER - SHORT-TERM WEAKNESS, LONG_TERM POTENTIAL Copper has been loosing momentum for the past weeks after a 58% appreciation since 2025. While this short-term weakness could bring it slightly lower over the coming weeks, one should not forget that, once adjusted for money supply, copper still trades on its 25th percentile. In other words, copper has been more expensive 75% of the time, what lets me think that the commodity remains cheap, especially given its demand projections for the coming decades. The way I play it? I rotate between commodities (and commodity producers) to overweigh the cheapest ones, taking some profits on recent winners (whose short-term risk-reward has become less attractive), which I reinvest in recent laggards. I explained this rational in the note below. $COPX $CPER
View original →PLATINUM VS SILVER Up 7% since the note below has been published, the platinum-to-silver ratio remains in the lower end of its long-term cycle, where platinum's risk-reward is far more attractive than silver's. Indeed, while a return to the ratio's long-term trend would imply a 140% outperformance for platinum, reaching 2σ on the upside would bring this outperformance to +357%. $PPLT $PLTM $SIL
View original →URANIUM MINERS VS OIL PRODUCERS I have explained in a recent article (below) why did I rebalance from oil producers (taking profits on a large part of my position) to uranium miners, which strongly corrected in 2026. Fast forward to today, uranium miners have already outperformed oil producers by 11%, as the URNM-to-XLE ratio shows. Indeed, being an energy bull, I however know that while most energy source follow relatively similar long-term cycles, they may diverge over the short- to medium-term. Here is why I do not hesitate to take profits on recent winners (oil producers in that moment) to allocate additional funds to laggards whose upside potential remains important (uranium miners here). $URNM and $XLE used as proxies here.
View original →NICKEL PRODUCERS VS COPPER MINERS After having reached a very oversold level, the nickel-producers-to-copper-miners ratio has been consolidating for a few months on its long-term support. Such setup already happened twice in the past, preceding a new period of outperformance for nickel producers relative to copper miners. From here, reaching its next resistance would imply a +260% outperformance for solana:HBdKuRvRrJcbUGxxNfh622zJPrhpJF6q24Udeubmpump relative to $COPX .
View original →
