Called $BTC bullish on Jan 23, 2022: $BTC rose 30% in 2 months.
View call →
@alphabetasoup_ -- Relentlessly curious -- I read a lot -- Big mouth -- Student of history -- Bitcoin
Cite asCryptoQuant has tracked the directional calls on NFLX by @TXMCtrades on X since Dec 2021: not yet scored on NFLX (as of Nov 12, 2026).
Other assets covered (16)
1 NFLX call on record, a thin history.
Relative view by default: fewer than 30 NFLX calls or days on record.
Sentiment timeline shows relative sentiment within this analyst's history. A perma-bull showing 8 bullish : 2 bearish in a bear market sets that as their baseline. If you notice any errors, claim @TXMCtrades to submit corrections.
Called $BTC bullish on Jan 23, 2022: $BTC rose 30% in 2 months.
View call →Hover the chart to read the thesis of that period · click a day to pin it
Thank you, Tom! I believe I my BTC analysis the past year has been pretty good. One of the few who saw the bear starting in October last year. Trying to get better every week. https://t.co/Jtn55HJtAW https://t.co/mNwNE7cbKn
View original →My latest video covering $BTC price action, and how to decipher whether the bull market has begun or if the bear still dominates. YT link in the tweet below Give it a watch! Subscribe and share, friends. https://t.co/B5ZhykGqb7 https://t.co/mRVUEclcBJ
View original →Man discovers Bitcoin had a bear market thirteen months after the peak https://t.co/FFAGTsQG8O
View original →Bitcoin ran from 15.5K to 74K under a Democrat president who was actively canceling banking access and shutting crypto out of the financial system and now that Dems won a midterm the whole feed is on suicide watch. Connect the dots for me. https://t.co/2qPmkmlUHq
View original →An investment is something people hold because they expect its value to rise. Money is something people hold because they expect to use it in exchange. Bitcoin can continue appreciating as an investment without ever becoming widely used as money. Rising demand to own an asset doesn’t necessarily create growing desire to transact in it. These are two different sources of demand, and there’s no requirement that one produces the other. The idea that Bitcoin will appreciate until some future threshold where investment demand naturally becomes monetary demand is an assertions that hasn’t been sufficiently proven, in my view. Why should a higher price suddenly make people want to spend what they’ve been incentivized to accumulate? A rising price demonstrates demand for Bitcoin. It doesn’t tell us what people demand Bitcoin *for*. @saifedean
View original →
