Says the guy who top ticked $NVDA and the rest of large cap tech and who confidently recommended of $ORCL $INTC $MU $CAT $BA Paramount et al... "Physician, heal thyself." - Luke 4:23 Is there any stated criteria in the selection of panelists? If so, how is @jlebenthal still a panelist? @TheJudgeCNBC Why aren't panelists recommendations time stamped so viewers can evaluate who is value added and who is not worth listening to? Do panelists on the show EVER say.. "I was wrong." Finally what is each panelists' investment process and methodology - what distinguishes them and qualifies to give recommendations on the most important business platform extant? PS I, too, attended Princeton - but they never taught risk management of stock portfolios. They did at Wharton (where I also attended)... but it wasn't in Dr. Jeremy Siegel's classes! We are but five percent off the all time high in the S and P but, with the tide going out, many are exposed already as swimming naked. What do you suppose will happen with their recommendations in a ten to twenty percent drawdown? We all make mistakes - I am often wrong and always in doubt. But I don't pretend to be right all the time and I take ownership of my errors. I model companies and try to deliver analytical rigor. I don't bring these investment boners up because I am attacking you personally. Rather, I am being an advocate to the retail viewer @cnbc - to protect them from non rigorous investment recommendations that ma not be an outgrowth of disciplined and rigorous analysis. If you or anyone else on @CNBC wants to dispute this or believes I am being ad hominem, please tell me why as I can always learn. @TheJudgeCNBC @squawkbox @cnbcfastmoney @cnbhalftime @KeithMcCullough @Hedgeye_HGRO @RPKInvestor @HedgeyeDJ @gnoble79 @andrewrsorkin @beckyquick @saraeisen @SullyCNBC @tomkeene @lisaabramowicz1 @ferrotv @annmarie @business @peterboockvar @convertbond @whitneytilson
View original →