Called $CRV bullish on Dec 6, 2022: $CRV rose 77% in 2 months.
View call →
Founder @_dexuai | Narratives | Data maxi
accuracy score 51.7 on HYPE over 17 HYPE calls · 373 days of data · rank 8 of 20 HYPE analysts (top 40.0% of the pool) · top 3.20% of an estimated 250 HYPE analysts worldwide · v20r-multi-sparsepen-strong-ss12m-20261012, computed Nov 4, 2026 · Methodology →
Cite asCryptoQuant has tracked 17 directional calls on HYPE by @CryptoKoryo on X since Oct 2021: ranked #8 of 20 analysts scored on HYPE by accuracy — in the Top 5% of an estimated 250 HYPE analysts worldwide (as of Nov 11, 2026).
Other assets covered (28)
Relative view by default: fewer than 30 HYPE calls or days on record.
Sentiment timeline shows relative sentiment within this analyst's history. A perma-bull showing 8 bullish : 2 bearish in a bear market sets that as their baseline. If you notice any errors, claim @CryptoKoryo to submit corrections.
Called $CRV bullish on Dec 6, 2022: $CRV rose 77% in 2 months.
View call →Hover the chart to read the thesis of that period · click a day to pin it
few years ago Near was known to be an unused L1. then they moved to ai. but they didn't stop there. they have been pushing relentlessly in the last 2 years. confidential intents/perps, supports perps on hyperliquid, and tokenized equities, and more. not surprising their token is doing better than all other ai alts, including tao.
View original →all you need is $hype (l1+perps) $zec (privacy) $near (ai) $pump (degen) $aero (dex) $pendle (yield) diversified yet high concentration. anything else is beta. https://t.co/e9fv9qKm5v
View original →In the last year, every single L1 coin went down except $hype https://t.co/H1oeiSuTWL
View original →is the L1 wars now settled? newer generation L1s like aptos, sui, sei, berachain were not able to keep their early momentum. monad still too early to tell. seems the specialized L1s theory hasn't really worked out so far. plasma might be the only exception. hyperliquid starting from hyper specialized L1 and slowly expanding use cases as the core product was generating revenue makes more sense to me than starting with a general purpose L1 with no edge and just burn cash on incentives.
View original →the market is not betting on $mon because it has the best fundamentals today. it’s bidding $mon because it launched at a valuation that left room for the market to care. $hype and $trx make sense as leader l1 coins. one has real revenue, the other has years of adoption behind it. $mon has neither. low revenue, newly listed, and in a market that has been absolutely brutal to new alts since 2025. and yet it’s still outperforming. why? because it came public cheap enough to actually work. 1 month after tge, $mon was ~$235m mcap. $apt was ~$600m. $bera was ~$729m. $S was ~$1.5b. if you launch too high, the market spends the next 6 months trying to escape your cap table. if you launch low enough, the market can underwrite upside. that’s the whole game now. price is now increasing its mindshare: monad is noq top 5 among l1s. the flywheel effect is kicking. in this cycle, fair launch valuation is not a nice-to-have. it is almost the only ways a new token gives itself a chance.
View original →
