Head of digital assets research @VanEck_us. PM, VanEck Onchain Economy ETF ($NODE). Disclosures https://t.co/oN8RR1GzoJ https://t.co/kuyqdO3qgW
Cite asCryptoQuant has tracked the directional calls on MARA by @matthew_sigel on X since Apr 2024: not yet scored on MARA (as of Nov 11, 2026).
Other assets covered (42)
Relative view by default: fewer than 30 MARA calls or days on record.
Sentiment timeline shows relative sentiment within this analyst's history. A perma-bull showing 8 bullish : 2 bearish in a bear market sets that as their baseline. If you notice any errors, claim @matthew_sigel to submit corrections.
Hover the chart to read the thesis of that period · click a day to pin it
Remember the "earnings calls" when $MARA took zero analyst questions? Clearly things have improved with a full roster of sell-siders asking q's this quarter. https://t.co/UiKc2EDDn5
View original →"Since the election, we've seen a kind of a surge, if you would, of demand where tenants that would normally not have looked at some of our peripheral sites are now saying, listen, if you have power availability, just let me come in."
$MARA on demand dynamics for the 100MW Kearney, NE site --> "Since the election, we've seen a kind of a surge, if you would, of demand where tenants that would normally not have looked at some of our peripheral sites are now saying, listen, if you have power availability, just let me come in."
View original →>BTC price-driven beat >Revenue miss on weather-related downturn in certain sites >"Still targeting two leases before year-end...but timing could slip into next year" >Sold BTC and paid back $750M in debt >New $500M stock repurchase authorized >Acquired sub Exaion signs $79M GPU-as-a-service contract with first ever customer. 100% take or pay terms. Exaion pipeline exceeds $3B
$MARA >BTC price-driven beat >Revenue miss on weather-related downturn in certain sites >"Still targeting two leases before year-end...but timing could slip into next year" >Sold BTC and paid back $750M in debt >New $500M stock repurchase authorized >Acquired sub Exaion signs $79M GPU-as-a-service contract with first ever customer. 100% take or pay terms. Exaion pipeline exceeds $3B
View original →Monday: NRG, CEG, MARA, BTGO Tuesday: BTDR, HIVE, WYFI, CRWV, Softbank, SE, CAN, ETOR Wednesday: RUM Thursday: BRUN, DPC, NBIS, FIGR, BTBT, ABXX, LGN, FPS, CBRS, NU Friday: XXI, GEMI
Busy earnings week for digital assets and data centers --> Monday: NRG, CEG, MARA, BTGO Tuesday: BTDR, HIVE, WYFI, CRWV, Softbank, SE, CAN, ETOR Wednesday: RUM Thursday: BRUN, DPC, NBIS, FIGR, BTBT, ABXX, LGN, FPS, CBRS, NU Friday: XXI, GEMI
View original →Long Ridge closes by Nov 30; a signed lease is next catalyst, but grid capacity is unproven
Huge relief for $MARA. FERC approved $MARA’s Long Ridge acquisition today (EC26-92). Good to see the IMM’s spurious BlackRock/Vanguard challenge get the Heisman. FERC also turned down the request to condition approval on keeping the plant’s output in PJM. Solid. The deal: $1.512B enterprise value for ~0.5 GW of gas generation (485 MW authorized, 505 MW nameplate) and ~$144M of annualized adj. EBITDA, about 10.5x. Recent PJM gas plant deals went at about 7x (Talen 6.7x, Vistra 7x, NRG 7.5x), which would put the plant alone at ~$1.0B. MARA is paying ~$0.5B more for the land, gas wells, rail and expansion option. MARA keeps ~$900M of Long Ridge debt in place and needs ~$610M of cash, which the $600M of BTC-backed loans it drew in August are meant to cover. I’d expect it to close by the Nov 30 outside date. Debt math: ~$1.9B of MARA’s $2.3B convert stack is zero coupon, so total post-close cash interest is roughly $140M: ~$58M on the Coinbase and Two Prime loans, ~$76M on Long Ridge’s own debt (the 8.75% notes alone are $52.5M) and ~$7M on the converts. Judging the deal on its own: the debt that finances it (Long Ridge’s ~$76M plus ~$46M on the new BTC loans) costs ~$123M a year against $144M of EBITDA, about 1.2x. The upside is expansion. MARA talks about 600 gross MW of AI load at the site. That appears to include the existing 200 MW of grid load (on top of the 505 MW plant that sells into PJM). AEP’s 2025 filing proposed reconductoring the feeder serving a customer at the Hannibal station to go from 100 to 200 MW, for about $0.5M, targeting about nine months from PJM first seeing the need to in-service. The station ties into four 138 kV lines and once fed a 540 MW smelter, which is encouraging, but nothing is signed. To get from 200 to 600 MW, AEP would likely need to add a second feed or upgrade lines, or MARA would build on-site generation, which raises turbine availability questions. I can’t find a public study of how much more the grid connection can carry. AEP Ohio’s data center tariff also requires large customers to pay for at least 85% of contracted capacity for up to 12 years, if it applies here. Still, an energized site with fuel, land and a 138 kV hub may beat waiting in ERCOT’s queue. It’s unclear whether the Hannibal buildout goes through the Starwood JV, where MARA would keep up to 50%. That will decide how much of the 600 MW upside MARA owns. Each 100MW developed at a 7% cap rate and $2M/MW rent could be $1.5B+ of value creation, so it's a big variable and explains why they paid ~$500M above the 7x multiple for the extra capacity. Next catalyst, possibly at closing or just after: a signed lease.
View original →