|+| I'll eat when I'm hungry #Bitcoin |+| Magic @thestorecloud //
accuracy score 46.2 on HYPE over 14 HYPE calls · 185 days of data · rank 13 of 20 HYPE analysts (top 65.0% of the pool) · top 5.20% of an estimated 250 HYPE analysts worldwide · v20r-multi-sparsepen-strong-ss12m-20261012, computed Nov 4, 2026 · Methodology →
Cite asCryptoQuant has tracked 14 directional calls on HYPE by @bitcoinjack on X since Sep 2021: ranked #13 of 20 analysts scored on HYPE by accuracy — in the Top 10% of an estimated 250 HYPE analysts worldwide (as of Nov 11, 2026).
Other assets covered (20)
Relative view by default: fewer than 30 HYPE calls or days on record.
Sentiment timeline shows relative sentiment within this analyst's history. A perma-bull showing 8 bullish : 2 bearish in a bear market sets that as their baseline. If you notice any errors, claim @bitcoinjack to submit corrections.
Hover the chart to read the thesis of that period · click a day to pin it
The Bitcoin social layer has become so confused that they rather solve witness encryption than upgrade Bitcoin, and are proud of it. I love Bitcoin for that, but at some point you have to admit you are working with constraints that are most likely not overcome, or if they are, it will take many many years to figure out how to adopt it such that it becomes useful and easy to use, because you have to invent so many weird quirks to make it work. Realistically this solution won't turn useful, and will require years to validate security assumptions. It works vs it's useful are two different planets. The discussion should shift to consensus upgrades, something I have been saying for some time now. Meanwhile, on planet Z, things are moving at the speed of light and much of what's required is already in place. Last year, for the first time ever since joining this space in 2016, I realized there is actual competition to Bitcoin's moat. I never thought this would happen, but I also never thought that, 10 years later, Bitcoin would still struggle to enforce meaningful upgrades to its base protocol. I truly understand the hesitation to make upgrades. Bitcoin's strength is derived from exactly that. But its strength has become its weakness. Rome fell out of arrogance. I hope the ship will correct its course. In the meantime, ZCash is our hope, especially if Democrats win the mid terms and the Presidential election in 2028. With AI taking over the world, privacy becomes a necessity, even more so depending on who makes the rules. Fwiw, ZEC and NEAR intents can serve as the privacy layer to Bitcoin, today. The most logical allocation is to own both. Bitcoin for the highest security assumptions one can make, ZEC as the SoV hedge Bitcoin will remain stagnant, private chain agnostic spending account and privacy becomings a necessity before Bitcoin can see the light. The self sovereign individual is gravitating to a $ZEC x $NEAR x $VVV x (some to be decided crypto x AI behemoth 10000x coin) x $HYPE etc stack
View original →Check out $SECZ Then look at ethereum:0xfaba6f8e4a5e8ab82f62fe7c39859fa577269be3, $ENA etc Should be blatantly obvious that the tokenize everything trade is moving at lightning speed Institutional interest is soaring and those who are interested are early, considering that the masses are still to wake up to it To imagine this doesn't sustain a large bid under majors is silly. BTC, ETH, SOL, ZEC etc Holy shit $HYPE ethereum:0x232ce3bd40fcd6f80f3d55a522d03f25df784ee2
View original →