XLEEnergy Select Sector SPDR FundNeutralEnergy Select Sector SPDR Fund

4d ago on

(Idea) Transocean - Near-Term Results Obscure A Brighter Future

By: Jon Costello Transocean ( RIG ) shares have been clobbered over the past few trading sessions, down 25.6% since October 30, versus the XLE’s 12.2% decline over the same period. I believe the selloff is partly due to macro angst toward oil and partly to weak headline third-quarter results, which the company reported on November 2. Overall, I think both are overblown and that the current share price represents a good entry point for investors willing to hold for at least three years. Macro Oil Weakness The general macro angst is the easy part to explain. Transocean shares are correlated with oil prices. The company’s large market cap for the energy sector and its relatively high leverage make it a favorite plaything of macro funds looking to short oil through means other than futures. Its short interest is pushing 30%. The following table shows the tight correlation between Transocean shares and WTI. The relationship is peculiar, as the company’s results and prospects are not tied to spot crude prices. Clearly, they depend far less on spot oil prices than those of many other larger oil companies, such as E&Ps. As Transocean’s leverage comes down after its Valaris ( VAL ) acquisition and continued efforts to pay down debt, while its earnings stabilize over the coming quarters, I expect macro funds will grow less fond of using the shares as a shorting instrument. If so, this should temper some of the volatility the shares have exhibited for many years. It might also reduce the tight correlation with oil. Periods of macro oil weakness like this one would be less likely to send the shares reeling. Read more

XLEEnergy Select Sector SPDR FundBullishEnergy Select Sector SPDR FundNVDANVIDIANeutralNVIDIAXLMStellarNeutralStellarQQQNasdaqBearishNasdaqSPYS&P 500BearishS&P 500

3w ago on

Memo - I Just Don't See How This Ends Well At All

By: Wilson I am a value investor by nature, but my investing experience has taught me to be more attuned to sentiment and price action. As Jon and I look at the broader investing landscape through the lens of energy specialists, I don’t see how any of this will end well. Jon published a WOMM piece yesterday saying he doesn’t see any bargains in the market . It’s a public article, and it’s worth 6-7 minutes of your time to read it. In general, we are on the same page, and while Jon is more conservative and leans towards doing “nothing,” I am a bit more adventurous (and stupid), as I put on a small short position on ARKK . You see, from the lens of an energy specialist, what we are seeing in the oil market today is just the tip of the iceberg. The Strait of Hormuz issue will be an ongoing conflict, and the market still sees it as transitory. Why? How could that be? It’s pretty simple really. Most people are too lazy to do the work. No, I really mean it. They look at the price action and conclude that nothing meaningful is going on. S&P 500 near an all-time high? Yeah, it’s probably a nothingburger. Nvidia guidance shows stellar AI demand growth? Yeah, it’s probably a nothingburger. Over the past decade, energy has been the sector where you throw your career away. For those of us who survived, the numerous battle scars can fill a bookshelf. I can’t count how many times I thought about quitting. You can read through the archive in the “memo” tab to get a glimpse of the pain we all had to go through. But now that energy is front and center in the global investing landscape, most people are still choosing to ignore it because it’s transitory. IEA, the energy agency created to help the world avoid an oil shortage, continues to blatantly publish reports that sound like propaganda pieces. “We will be fine,” it says. Source: IEA All you have to do is compare its forward oil deficit projections today with what it published in June. Another quarter went by; it revised the deficits higher, changed the Q4 2026 surplus into a deficit, and then continued to forecast a 2027 surplus. Seriously, that’s not analysis. That’s Excel drag on steroids. And although this kind of stuff gets on my nerves, as you can probably tell from the tone of this memo, it still gives me hope that the worst is ahead of us. It’s usually never a good thing when IEA panics, because when it does, it’s probably the time to sell everything. But if my read on the market is right, the only way we reach the “fevered” sentiment point is for the broader market to sell off. Read more